
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is positioned at rank #24 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.
| Insight | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU scores 4,403 and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti reaches 4,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403 | 4,415 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+205% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+367% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+53% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+809% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+953% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+953% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 29.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GK104 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 16 2012 |
| Ranking | #474 | #472 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















