Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla C2075

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 455

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 247W, a 212W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌605.7% higher power demand at 247W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 455 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (3,113 vs 3,017), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 455 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 455 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 455

The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 455 scores 3,113 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 455 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score	3,113+3%	3,017
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+71%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.313 TFLOPS+28%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 455 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	0	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 455 draws 35W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 150.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 455) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
TDP	35W-86%	247W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	88.9+629%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 455 came in at $0, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 455) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 455 (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon Pro 455	Tesla C2075
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	Baffin	GF110
Release	October 30 2016	July 25 2011
Ranking	#577	#553

Search Radeon Pro 455 on Amazon

Search Tesla C2075 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.