
Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Arc A530M

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:

Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is positioned at rank 29 and the Arc A530M is on rank 243, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Arc A530M

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,910 | 8,013+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+35% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+35% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 8 MB (Arc A530M) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 63.2% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 65W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 63.3 | 123.3+95% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | DG2-256 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 1 2023 |
| Ranking | #322 | #317 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















