
Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is positioned at rank 29 and the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is on rank 150, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design reaches 8,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,910 | 8,119+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+45% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 60W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 63.3 | 135.3+114% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | TU106 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #322 | #313 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















