
Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Quadro M5500

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:

Quadro M5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is positioned at rank 29 and the Quadro M5500 is on rank 141, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M5500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $200 for the Quadro M5500, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 99.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Quadro M5500

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Quadro M5500 reaches 7,915 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1165 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,910 | 7,915 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+13% | 4.772 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+51% | 1165 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5500 has 8 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (Maxwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-17% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 63.3+20% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro M5500 launched at $800 and now averages $200. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 39.6 (Quadro M5500) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 99.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-75% | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-50% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.1+100% | 39.6 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #322 | #321 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















