
Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Radeon 880M

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon 880M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is positioned at rank 29 and the Radeon 880M is on rank 209, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 880M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 880M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5500 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Radeon 880M

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Radeon 880M reaches 7,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 768 (Radeon 880M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,910+2% | 7,729 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+21% | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz | 2900 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon 880M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Radeon 880M's 15W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 350W (Radeon 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 63.3 | 515.3+714% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Strix Point |
| Release | August 4 2020 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #322 | #329 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















