G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 6400 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
25.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌135.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 125W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (7,910 vs 7,728), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro 5500 XT has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.3% (48.6 vs 39.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro 5500 XT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2321 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score	7,910+2%	7,728
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.398 TFLOPS+51%	3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1757 MHz	2321 MHz+32%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+100%	48
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500 XT and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
Encoder	VCN 2.0	None
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 80.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
TDP	125W	53W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	172mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	63.3	145.8+130%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 5500 XT came in at $199, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6400 was 20.1% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 22.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2020).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
MSRP	$199	$159-20%
Performance per Dollar	39.7	48.6+22%
Codename	Navi 14	Navi 24
Release	August 4 2020	January 19 2022
Ranking	#322	#330

Search Radeon Pro 5500 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.