Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 555?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the mobile professional Radeon Pro 555 reveal over over a decade of GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 2000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle basic creative tasks to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB wins on absolute architectural scale, featuring a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 support. The Radeon Pro 555 is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy graphics to a 40-series discrete tower is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual depth needed for high-end rendering in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The Radeon Pro 555 is strictly for basic office use on legacy notebooks today. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 555 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 522.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 555.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-522.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+522.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $1,000 for the Radeon Pro 555, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1981.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1981.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 522.3%. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,141 | 19,548+522% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3072+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+1057% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 555 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 555 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-35% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 41.9 | 170.0+306% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($701 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.1 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2009.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $299-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.1 | 65.4+2010% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | AD107 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #574 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 555 and GeForce RTX 4060
