Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla M10
Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:
Tesla M10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 555.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M10 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M10 holds the technical lead. Priced at $500 (vs $1,000), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla M10
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.
Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,141 | 3,173+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 ×4 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 41.9+197% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The Tesla M10 costs 50% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.1 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 6.3 (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 offers 103.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $500-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.1 | 6.3+103% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #574 | #570 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla M10
