
Quadro M1200
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Quadro M1200
2017Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M1200 better than Radeon Pro 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 555 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and Radeon Pro 555

Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212+2% | 3,141 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS+7% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 555 has 2 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+70% | 41.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #567 | #574 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












