Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla K40m

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla K40m FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla K40m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 245W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40m

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌226.7% higher power demand at 245W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K40m is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,143 vs 3,141), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K40m makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K40m is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla K40m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

Tesla K40m

The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Tesla K40m
G3D Mark Score	3,141	3,143
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2880+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+286%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	48	240+400%
L1 Cache	192 KB	240 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Tesla K40m
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40m. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Tesla K40m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Tesla K40m
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 106.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Tesla K40m
TDP	75W-69%	245W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	41.9+227%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Tesla K40m
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	Polaris 21	GK110B
Release	June 5 2017	November 22 2013
Ranking	#574	#573

Search Radeon Pro 555 on Amazon

Search Tesla K40m on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.