GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon Pro 555

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon Pro 555 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon Pro 555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470

2010

Why buy it

✅48.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌186.7% higher power demand at 215W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 215W, a 140W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 470 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,145 vs 3,141), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 470 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 470 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon Pro 555 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 470

The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470 scores 3,145 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).

Feature	GeForce GTX 470	Radeon Pro 555
G3D Mark Score	3,145	3,141
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 470 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 555 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470	Radeon Pro 555
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 555 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro 555 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470	Radeon Pro 555
VRAM Capacity	1.25 GB	2 GB+60%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470 draws 215W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 96.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 470) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470	Radeon Pro 555
TDP	215W	75W-65%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	93	—
Perf/Watt	14.6	41.9+187%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 470 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555 was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 470	Radeon Pro 555
MSRP	$349	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	Infinity
Codename	GF100	Polaris 21
Release	March 26 2010	June 5 2017
Ranking	#572	#574

Search GeForce GTX 470 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 555 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.