GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470

2010

Why buy it

  • 43.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 377.8% higher power demand at 215W vs 45W.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • 220% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 215W, a 170W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 470 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M1200 instead at 3,212 vs 3,145, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 470 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 470 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470

The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470 scores 3,145 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
G3D Mark Score
3,145
3,212+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
640+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.089 TFLOPS
1.399 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
2 MB+217%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 470 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M1200 gives you 220% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470 and 64-bit on the Quadro M1200. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
VRAM Capacity
1.25 GB
4 GB+220%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
2 MB+217%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
DirectX
11.0
12 (11_0)+9%
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 470) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 470) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
Encoder
None
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
H.264,HEVC,VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470 draws 215W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 130.8% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 470) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 82°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
TDP
215W
45W-79%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
93
82°C-12%
Perf/Watt
14.6
71.4+389%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 470 came in at $349, while the Quadro M1200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M1200 was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs Infinity (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470Quadro M1200
MSRP
$349
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
9.0
Infinity
Codename
GF100
GM107
Release
March 26 2010
January 11 2017
Ranking
#572
#567

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.