
GeForce GTX 470

Quadro M1200
GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 470
2010Why buy it
- ✅43.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌377.8% higher power demand at 215W vs 45W.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅220% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 215W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro M1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 470 scores 3,145 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,145 | 3,212+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 640+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS | 1.399 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 470 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M1200 gives you 220% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470 and 64-bit on the Quadro M1200. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.25 GB | 4 GB+220% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 470) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 470) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 470 draws 215W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 130.8% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 470) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 45W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | 82°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 14.6 | 71.4+389% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 470 came in at $349, while the Quadro M1200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M1200 was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs Infinity (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | GM107 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #572 | #567 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














