
GeForce GTX 470

Radeon R9 M290X
GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon R9 M290X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon R9 M290X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon R9 M290X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 470
2010Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌115% higher power demand at 215W vs 100W.
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅220% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 215W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌14.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 470 vs Radeon R9 M290X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 470 scores 3,145 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,145 | 3,218+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1280+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+112% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 470 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M290X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M290X gives you 220% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M290X. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 470) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce GTX 470 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.25 GB | 4 GB+220% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 470 draws 215W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 73% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 470) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 100W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.6 | 32.2+121% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 470 came in at $349, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 470 was 12.8% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce GTX 470 offers 12.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M290X (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-13% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+13% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GF100 | Neptune |
| Release | March 26 2010 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #572 | #566 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














