
Radeon Pro 555X vs FirePro W5000

Radeon Pro 555X
Popular choices:

FirePro W5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 555X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro 555X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 555X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $1,049 for the Radeon Pro 555X, it costs 96% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 2493.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2493.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,049) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555X and FirePro W5000

Radeon Pro 555X
The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

FirePro W5000
The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555X scores 3,000 and the FirePro W5000 reaches 2,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555X is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 768 (FirePro W5000). Raw compute: 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000+1% | 2,967 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.393 TFLOPS+10% | 1.267 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W5000) — the Radeon Pro 555X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555X draws 75W versus the FirePro W5000's 75W — a 0% difference. The FirePro W5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 350W (FirePro W5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 183mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.0+1% | 39.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $1049, while the FirePro W5000 launched at $599 and now averages $40. The FirePro W5000 costs 96.2% less ($1009 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.9 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 74.2 (FirePro W5000) — the FirePro W5000 offers 2458.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 555X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1049 | $40-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 74.2+2459% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 16 2018 | August 7 2012 |
| Ranking | #564 | #585 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















