Radeon Pro 555X vs Quadro K1200
Radeon Pro 555X
Popular choices:
Quadro K1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 555X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 555X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K1200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 555X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $184 versus $1,049 for the Radeon Pro 555X, it costs 82% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 463.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+463.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,049) | ✅More affordable ($184) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555X and Quadro K1200
Radeon Pro 555X
The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555X scores 3,000 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000+1% | 2,965 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.393 TFLOPS+32% | 1.0578 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 555X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 has 4 GB. The Quadro K1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555X draws 75W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 45W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 40.0 | 65.9+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $1049, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300 and now averages $184. The Quadro K1200 costs 82.5% less ($865 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.9 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 16.1 (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 offers 455.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 555X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1049 | $184-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 16.1+455% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #564 | #586 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 555X and Quadro K1200
