
Radeon Pro 555X vs GRID M10-4Q

Radeon Pro 555X
Popular choices:

GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 555X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 555X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 555X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-4Q.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M10-4Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $340 versus $1,049 for the Radeon Pro 555X, it costs 68% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 206.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,049) | ✅More affordable ($340) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555X and GRID M10-4Q

Radeon Pro 555X
The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555X scores 3,000 and the GRID M10-4Q reaches 2,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555X is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000 | 2,977 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.393 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555X draws 75W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 40.0+203% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $1049, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805 and now averages $340. The GRID M10-4Q costs 67.6% less ($709 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.9 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 8.8 (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q offers 203.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 555X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555X | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2805 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1049 | $340-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 8.8+203% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #564 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















