Radeon Pro 555X vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 555X vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 555X vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 555X

2018

Why buy it

✅37.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Radeon R7 260 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 555X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 555X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌26.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 555X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,892), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 555X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555X has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 555X vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 555X

The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555X scores 3,000 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555X	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	3,000+4%	2,892
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.393 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	48	48
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 555X	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 555X has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. Radeon Pro 555X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555X and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon Pro 555X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555X	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555X draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 555X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555X	Radeon R7 260
TDP	75W-21%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	40.0+32%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 555X came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555X was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555X) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon Pro 555X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555X (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555X	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$0-100%	$109
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	26.5
Codename	Polaris 21	Bonaire
Release	July 16 2018	December 17 2013
Ranking	#564	#591

Search Radeon Pro 555X on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.