Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro 555X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro 555X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro 555X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1200

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 555X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro 555X

2018

Why buy it

✅9.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Quadro K1200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 555X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 555X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (3,000 vs 2,965), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 555X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K1200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K1200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555X has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro 555X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Radeon Pro 555X

The Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Radeon Pro 555X reaches 3,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 555X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555X). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 1.393 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555X).

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro 555X
G3D Mark Score	2,965	3,000+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.0578 TFLOPS	1.393 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro 555X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 555X carries 2 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro 555X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 555X's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro 555X
TDP	45W-40%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	65.9+65%	40.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K1200 came in at $300, while the Radeon Pro 555X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555X was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro K1200) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555X) — the Radeon Pro 555X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555X (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro 555X
MSRP	$300	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	9.9	Infinity
Codename	GM107	Polaris 21
Release	January 28 2015	July 16 2018
Ranking	#586	#564

Search Quadro K1200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 555X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.