Quadro K1200 vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1200

2015

Why buy it

✅25.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
175.2% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 26.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K1200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K1200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (2,965 vs 2,892), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K1200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $191 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 168.5% (26.5 vs 9.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K1200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,965+3%	2,892
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.0578 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1100 MHz+6%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 71.4% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon R7 260
TDP	45W-53%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	65.9+117%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K1200 came in at $300, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260 was 63.7% cheaper ($191 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro K1200) vs 26.5 (Radeon R7 260) — the Radeon R7 260 offers 167.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K1200 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	$300	$109-64%
Performance per Dollar	9.9	26.5+168%
Codename	GM107	Bonaire
Release	January 28 2015	December 17 2013
Ranking	#586	#591

Search Quadro K1200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.