
Quadro K1200 vs Radeon HD 6990

Quadro K1200
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K1200 is positioned at rank #142 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $184 (vs $498), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 166.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+166.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($184) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($498) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K1200 and Radeon HD 6990

Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Radeon HD 6990
The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Radeon HD 6990 reaches 3,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6990 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990).
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,965 | 3,014+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1536 ×2+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.0578 TFLOPS | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+141% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96 ×2+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6990 has 2 GB. The Quadro K1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6990) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6990's 375W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 750W (Radeon HD 6990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-88% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 310mm |
| Height | — | 115mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 65.9+724% | 8.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K1200 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $184, while the Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699 and now averages $498. The Quadro K1200 costs 63.1% less ($314 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.1 (Quadro K1200) vs 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) — the Quadro K1200 offers 163.9% better value. The Quadro K1200 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-57% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $184-63% | $498 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+164% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GM107 | Antilles |
| Release | January 28 2015 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #586 | #583 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















