Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1200

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

✅35.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K1200 instead at 2,965 vs 2,870, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K1200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K1200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 37.7% (9.9 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4170 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Radeon Pro WX 4170 reaches 2,870 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro WX 4170
G3D Mark Score	2,965+3%	2,870
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.0578 TFLOPS	2.46 TFLOPS+133%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1201 MHz+16%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro WX 4170
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro WX 4170
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4170's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro WX 4170
TDP	45W-10%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	65.9+15%	57.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K1200 came in at $300, while the Radeon Pro WX 4170 launched at $400. On MSRP, Quadro K1200 was 25% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro K1200) vs 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) — the Quadro K1200 offers 37.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4170 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro K1200	Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP	$300-25%	$400
Performance per Dollar	9.9+38%	7.2
Codename	GM107	Baffin
Release	January 28 2015	November 10 2016
Ranking	#586	#526

Search Quadro K1200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4170 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.