Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K1200 is positioned at rank #142 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

91%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

88%

#127

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1495%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

100%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

99%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

98%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

97%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

96%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

95%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

93%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

93%

#151

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

92%

#152

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

92%

#154

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

91%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2075 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $184 (vs $500), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 167.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+167.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($184)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K1200 Benchmark Check

Tesla C2075 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K1200 and Tesla C2075

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

Feature	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score	2,965	3,017+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+14%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.0578 TFLOPS+3%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	256 KB	896 KB+250%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 has 2 GB. The Quadro K1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 138.4% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K1200	Tesla C2075
TDP	45W-82%	247W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	65.9+440%	12.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K1200 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $184, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Quadro K1200 costs 63.2% less ($316 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.1 (Quadro K1200) vs 6.0 (Tesla C2075) — the Quadro K1200 offers 168.3% better value. The Quadro K1200 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).