Quadro K1200
Tesla C2075
Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K1200
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 247W, a 202W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2075
2011Why buy it
- ✅Quadro K1200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2075 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌448.9% higher power demand at 247W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K1200 vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K1200 scores 2,965 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1200 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro K1200) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,965 | 3,017+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+14% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.0578 TFLOPS+3% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K1200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. Quadro K1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1200 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K1200) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K1200 draws 45W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 138.4% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1200) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-82% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 65.9+440% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K1200 came in at $300, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. On MSRP, Tesla C2075 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro K1200) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K1200 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K1200 | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | GF110 |
| Release | January 28 2015 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #586 | #553 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K1200 and Tesla C2075
