Radeon Pro 560 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Radeon Pro 560

2017Core: 907 MHz

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro 560

3,475

+1.8%

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Radeon RX 6800

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

134

3,415

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro 560 is positioned at rank #175 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 560

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

97%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

96%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

93%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

90%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

89%

#160

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2126%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

100%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

95%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

95%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

92%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

91%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

91%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

91%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

90%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.

Insight	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 194.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+194.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 560 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,475+2%	3,415
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS+17%	1.585 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	256 KB+300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 56.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	75W-44%	134W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	97°C
Perf/Watt	46.3+82%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.2 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 194.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).