Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,999 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 406.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 238W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
399.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌217.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,475 vs 3,428), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,999 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 406.7% (7.0 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	Tesla C2050 / C2070
G3D Mark Score	3,475+1%	3,428
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1024+129%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS+81%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	256 KB	896 KB+250%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	Tesla C2050 / C2070
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	Tesla C2050 / C2070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 104.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	Tesla C2050 / C2070
TDP	75W-68%	238W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	248mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	46.3+222%	14.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 560 came in at $500, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560 was 80% cheaper ($1999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon Pro 560 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon Pro 560	Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP	$500-80%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	7.0+400%	1.4
Codename	Polaris 21	GF100
Release	April 18 2017	July 25 2011
Ranking	#543	#569

Search Radeon Pro 560 on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 / C2070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.