GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon Pro 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition better than Radeon Pro 560?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,569 vs 3,475 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Pro 560 make more sense than GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition?

Yes. Radeon Pro 560 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 122W), and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition currently gives you 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 560 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 560 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
1080p
low	77 FPS	38 FPS
medium	63 FPS	23 FPS
high	48 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	64 FPS	25 FPS
medium	54 FPS	15 FPS
high	37 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	10 FPS
medium	23 FPS	7 FPS
high	14 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Open Radeon Pro 560

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
1080p
low	80 FPS	74 FPS
medium	57 FPS	46 FPS
high	44 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	19 FPS
1440p
low	45 FPS	36 FPS
medium	29 FPS	24 FPS
high	22 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	17 FPS	10 FPS
medium	11 FPS	7 FPS
high	9 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Open Radeon Pro 560

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
1080p
low	161 FPS	156 FPS
medium	128 FPS	125 FPS
high	107 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	117 FPS
medium	96 FPS	94 FPS
high	80 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	78 FPS
medium	64 FPS	63 FPS
high	54 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Open Radeon Pro 560

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
1080p
low	131 FPS	141 FPS
medium	102 FPS	108 FPS
high	88 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	72 FPS
1440p
low	99 FPS	102 FPS
medium	79 FPS	81 FPS
high	68 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	60 FPS
medium	44 FPS	45 FPS
high	35 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Open Radeon Pro 560

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and Radeon Pro 560

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
G3D Mark Score	3,569+3%	3,475
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.448 TFLOPS+32%	1.858 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 560 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Radeon Pro 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.