
Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon Pro 560

Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Radeon Pro 560 is on rank 175, so the Radeon Pro 560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 560
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 560 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $400 for the Arc 8-Core iGPU, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 164.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+164.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon Pro 560

Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Radeon Pro 560
The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,475 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1024+12700% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro 560 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 50% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+68% | 46.3 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 560 costs 62.5% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 23.2 (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 offers 163.6% better value. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $150-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 23.2+164% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Polaris 21 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #362 | #543 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













