Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon Pro W5500M
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Radeon Pro W5500M is on rank 3, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W5500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc 8-Core iGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon Pro W5500M
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,470 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1408+17500% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+59% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 61.5% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-47% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+91% | 40.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #362 | #544 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon Pro W5500M
