Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro K2200M
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Quadro K2200M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Quadro K2200M is on rank 27, so the Quadro K2200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2200M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Quadro K2200M
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Quadro K2200M
The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,535+1% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 640+7900% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+384% | 0.31 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M has 4 GB. The Quadro K2200M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 36.4% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-31% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+43% | 54.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GM107 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | July 19 2014 |
| Ranking | #362 | #539 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and Quadro K2200M
