Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro K2200
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Quadro K2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Quadro K2200 is on rank 169, so the Quadro K2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $400 for the Arc 8-Core iGPU, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 922.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+922.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Quadro K2200
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Quadro K2200
The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,580+2% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 640+7900% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+105% | 1124 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+384% | 0.31 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 has 4 GB. The Quadro K2200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 4th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 40.7% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-34% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 203mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8+48% | 52.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500 and now averages $40. The Quadro K2200 costs 90% less ($360 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 89.5 (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 offers 917% better value. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $40-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 89.5+917% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GM107 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #362 | #534 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and Quadro K2200
