Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon Pro 460
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Radeon Pro 460 is on rank 176, so the Radeon Pro 460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 460 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 460 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $400 for the Arc 8-Core iGPU, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 163.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+163.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon Pro 460
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+1% | 3,453 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1024+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+154% | 907 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro 460 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 25% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 35W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.8 | 98.7+27% |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 460 costs 62.5% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 offers 161.4% better value. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc 8-Core iGPU | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $503 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $150-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 23.0+161% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Baffin |
| Release | December 14 2023 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #362 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon Pro 460
