
Radeon Pro 560 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon Pro 560
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 560 is positioned at rank 175 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is on rank 92, so the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 560
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 560.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 277.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+277.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon Pro 560
The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560 scores 3,475 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560) vs 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,475 | 3,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS+13% | 1.647 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 550 (móvel)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 46.3 | 70.0+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) launched at $79 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.2 (Radeon Pro 560) vs 87.5 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers 277.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $79-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.2 | 87.5+277% |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Lexa |
| Release | April 18 2017 | July 2 2017 |
| Ranking | #543 | #614 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















