Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,475 vs 3,453), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $500 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.6% (7.0 vs 6.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 460 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560).

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Radeon Pro 560
G3D Mark Score	3,453	3,475
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS	1.858 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Radeon Pro 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560.

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Radeon Pro 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Radeon Pro 560
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	98.7+113%	46.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 460 came in at $500, while the Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 offers 1.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Radeon Pro 560
MSRP	$500	$500
Performance per Dollar	6.9	7.0+1%
Codename	Baffin	Polaris 21
Release	October 30 2016	April 18 2017
Ranking	#547	#543

Search Radeon Pro 460 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.