Radeon Pro 460 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 460 is positioned at rank 176 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is on rank 150, so the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

97%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

97%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

93%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

91%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

89%

#161

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2138%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

100%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

96%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

95%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

93%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

92%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

92%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

91%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

90%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

89%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#140

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

320%

#142

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

290%

#143

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

290%

#147

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

263%

#148

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

262%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses modern memory architecture. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 460 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Radeon Pro 460, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 194.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+194.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 460 Benchmark Check

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 460 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score	3,453+2%	3,390
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	14 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	1024+967%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 15.4% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP	35W	30W-14%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	98.7	113.0+14%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 194.8% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro 460	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP	$500	$100-80%
Avg Price (30d)	$150	$50-67%
Performance per Dollar	23.0	67.8+195%
Codename	Baffin	Tiger Lake Xe
Release	October 30 2016	August 15 2020
Ranking	#547	#508