GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
619.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,599 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 606.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,453), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,099 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 606.9% (6.9 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K520 has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460).

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro 460
G3D Mark Score	3,516+2%	3,453
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+23%	1.858 TFLOPS
ROPs	32 ×2+100%	16
TMUs	128 ×2+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K520) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro 460
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro 460
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.6	98.7+533%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K520 came in at $3599, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 460 was 86.1% cheaper ($3099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID K520) vs 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 offers 590% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 460 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K520	Radeon Pro 460
MSRP	$3599	$500-86%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	6.9+590%
Codename	GK104	Baffin
Release	July 23 2013	October 30 2016
Ranking	#540	#547

Search GRID K520 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.