
Radeon Pro 460

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅23.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌532.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $421 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 541.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Radeon Pro 460 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460) vs 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 1287 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,453 | 3,500+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS+13% | 1.647 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1287 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 460 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Radeon RX 550 (móvel)'s 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+41% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 460 came in at $500, while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 (móvel) was 84.2% cheaper ($421 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers 542% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (móvel) (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $79-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9 | 44.3+542% |
| Codename | Baffin | Lexa |
| Release | October 30 2016 | July 2 2017 |
| Ranking | #547 | #614 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















