Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is positioned at rank 479 and the Radeon Pro 460 is on rank 176, so the Radeon Pro 460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 460.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $150), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Radeon Pro 460
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+1% | 3,453 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2240+119% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0 | 98.7+41% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire offers 1.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $500-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3+1% | 23.0 |
| Codename | Blackcomb XTX | Baffin |
| Release | July 12 2011 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #517 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Radeon Pro 460
