Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 460

2016Core: 850 MHzBoost: 907 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 39.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 460

2016

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 37.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire instead at 3,500 vs 3,453, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 37.9% (6.9 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 460

The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro 460 reaches 3,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460).

FeatureRadeon HD 6990M CrossfireRadeon Pro 460
G3D Mark Score
3,500+1%
3,453
Architecture
Terascale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2240+119%
1024
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6990M CrossfireRadeon Pro 460
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 460.

FeatureRadeon HD 6990M CrossfireRadeon Pro 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 6990M CrossfireRadeon Pro 460
TDP
50W
35W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
70.0
98.7+41%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire came in at $699, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 460 was 28.5% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) — the Radeon Pro 460 offers 38% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 460 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6990M CrossfireRadeon Pro 460
MSRP
$699
$500-28%
Performance per Dollar
5.0
6.9+38%
Codename
Blackcomb XTX
Baffin
Release
July 12 2011
October 30 2016
Ranking
#517
#547

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.