GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013Core: 771 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011Core: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • 13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,569 vs 3,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
3,569+2%
3,500
Architecture
Kepler
Terascale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536
2240+46%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
DirectX
12 (11_0)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Encoder
NVENC
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 83.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 105mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
TDP
122W
50W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
105mm
0mm
Height
82mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-17%
90
Perf/Watt
29.3
70.0+139%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP
$699
Codename
GK104
Blackcomb XTX
Release
November 8 2013
July 12 2011
Ranking
#625
#517

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.