
FirePro W7170M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W7170M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro W7170M
2015Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W7170M better than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

FirePro W7170M
FirePro W7170M
The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,605+3% | 3,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2240+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire has 2 GB. The FirePro W7170M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (FirePro W7170M) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.1 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 36.0 | 70.0+94% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7170M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Codename | Amethyst | Blackcomb XTX |
| Release | October 2 2015 | July 12 2011 |
| Ranking | #533 | #517 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












