FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011Core: 715 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W7170M better than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,605 vs 3,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W7170M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7170M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro W7170M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro W7170M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $699 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,500 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low104 FPS37 FPS
medium89 FPS30 FPS
high73 FPS21 FPS
ultra43 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS29 FPS
medium80 FPS21 FPS
high58 FPS13 FPS
ultra33 FPS8 FPS
4K
low29 FPS11 FPS
medium27 FPS9 FPS
high18 FPS6 FPS
ultra16 FPS5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low96 FPS66 FPS
medium74 FPS44 FPS
high60 FPS32 FPS
ultra44 FPS21 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS37 FPS
medium40 FPS21 FPS
high31 FPS15 FPS
ultra23 FPS11 FPS
4K
low24 FPS13 FPS
medium17 FPS8 FPS
high13 FPS6 FPS
ultra10 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low162 FPS158 FPS
medium130 FPS126 FPS
high108 FPS105 FPS
ultra81 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS118 FPS
medium97 FPS94 FPS
high81 FPS79 FPS
ultra61 FPS59 FPS
4K
low81 FPS79 FPS
medium65 FPS63 FPS
high54 FPS52 FPS
ultra41 FPS39 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low162 FPS118 FPS
medium130 FPS90 FPS
high108 FPS61 FPS
ultra81 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS71 FPS
medium97 FPS51 FPS
high81 FPS37 FPS
ultra61 FPS26 FPS
4K
low75 FPS38 FPS
medium58 FPS26 FPS
high47 FPS19 FPS
ultra31 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
3,605+3%
3,500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Terascale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048
2240+9%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire has 2 GB. The FirePro W7170M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
DirectX
12+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (FirePro W7170M) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Encoder
VCE 3.1
None
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C-6%
90
Perf/Watt
36.0
70.0+94%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7170M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP
$699
Codename
Amethyst
Blackcomb XTX
Release
October 2 2015
July 12 2011
Ranking
#533
#517