Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W7170M vs T400

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W7170M vs T400 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W7170M
4 GB 100
3,605
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R9 M380
brand logoRadeon R7 260X
brand logoRadeon RX 470/570
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
T400
4 GB 30
3,609
+0.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 v2
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M SLI
brand logoRadeon R7 260X
brand logoRadeon RX 470/570
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7170M vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

T400

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro W7170M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,609 vs 3,605), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W7170M vs T400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400).

FeatureFirePro W7170MT400
G3D Mark Score
3,605
3,609
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS+171%
1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7170MT400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7170M and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 1 MB (T400) — the T400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7170MT400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the T400's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W7170MT400
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
—
Height
0mm
—
Slots
1
—
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
36.0
120.3+234%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W7170MT400
MSRP
—
$180
Codename
Amethyst
TU117
Release
October 2 2015
May 6 2021
Ranking
#533
#532
Search FirePro W7170M on AmazonSearch T400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.