FirePro W7170M
VS
GRID T4-2Q

FirePro W7170M vs GRID T4-2Q

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz
VS

GRID T4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W7170M is positioned at rank 22 and the GRID T4-2Q is on rank 231, so the FirePro W7170M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7170M

#7
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
328%
#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
78%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
74%
#22
FirePro W7170M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
98%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
88%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
82%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-2Q

#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
100%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
97%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
96%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
94%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
87%
#101
84%
#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
74%
#216
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3404%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
100%
#238
FirePro 3D V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
84%
#240
Quadro K600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
84%
#241
FirePro S7000
MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40
83%
#242
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
83%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
81%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
76%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID T4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7170M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID T4-2Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and GRID T4-2Q

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q).

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,605
3,668+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7170M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-2Q has 2 GB. The FirePro W7170M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (FirePro W7170M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q).

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
Encoder
VCE 3.1
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
UVD 6.0
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The FirePro W7170M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.

FeatureFirePro W7170MGRID T4-2Q
TDP
100W-56%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
70-18%
Perf/Watt
36.0+121%
16.3