FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 560

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • FirePro W7170M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (3,682 vs 3,605), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro W7170M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
3,605
3,682+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS+13%
2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W7170M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7170M and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7170M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (FirePro W7170M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC (FirePro W7170M) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
Encoder
VCE 3.1
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,HEVC
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70 C.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
170mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70 C-18%
Perf/Watt
36.0
49.1+36%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 560
MSRP
$99
Codename
Amethyst
Polaris 21
Release
October 2 2015
April 18 2017
Ranking
#533
#527

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.