FirePro W7170M vs P104-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7170M vs P104-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W7170M vs P104-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P104-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,605), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7170M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P104-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P104-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W7170M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W7170M vs P104-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100).

Feature	FirePro W7170M	P104-100
G3D Mark Score	3,605	3,678+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2048+7%	1920
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.961 TFLOPS	6.655 TFLOPS+125%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128+7%	120
L1 Cache	512 KB	720 KB+41%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7170M	P104-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7170M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the P104-100 carries 2 GB. FirePro W7170M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7170M and 64-bit on the P104-100. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W7170M	P104-100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W7170M	P104-100
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	36.0	122.6+241%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is P104-100 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	FirePro W7170M	P104-100
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	Amethyst	GP104
Release	October 2 2015	December 12 2017
Ranking	#533	#529

Search FirePro W7170M on Amazon

Search P104-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.