GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

GRID M6-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011Core: 715 MHz

GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 114.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,500 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $801 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 110.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M6-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,568 vs 3,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M6-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire makes the most sense to buy today. It is $801 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 110.5% (5.0 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M6-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
3,568+2%
3,500
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Terascale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536
2240+46%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-8Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
DirectX
12_1+9%
11.0
Max Displays
0
6
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
35.7
70.0+96%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-8Q came in at $1500, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire was 53.4% cheaper ($801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 5.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire offers 108.3% better value. The newer card here is GRID M6-8Q (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGRID M6-8QRadeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP
$1500
$699-53%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
5.0+108%
Codename
GM204
Blackcomb XTX
Release
August 30 2015
July 12 2011
Ranking
#535
#517

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.