GRID M6-8Q vs Quadro K2200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-8Q vs Quadro K2200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M6-8Q vs Quadro K2200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M6-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,568 vs 3,535), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M6-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M6-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M6-8Q vs Quadro K2200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q) vs 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M).

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	Quadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score	3,568	3,535
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS+160%	0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	96+140%	40
L1 Cache	576 KB+80%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	Quadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M6-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M.

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	Quadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 42.4% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	Quadro K2200M
TDP	100W	65W-35%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	35.7	54.4+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M6-8Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	Quadro K2200M
MSRP	$1500	—
Codename	GM204	GM107
Release	August 30 2015	July 19 2014
Ranking	#535	#539

Search GRID M6-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.