GRID M6-8Q vs P104-100

GRID M6-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS

P104-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
··

GRID M6-8Q vs P104-100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-8Q vs P104-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

P104-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P104-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,568), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M6-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M6-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. P104-100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M6-8Q vs P104-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

NVIDIA

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100).

FeatureGRID M6-8QP104-100
G3D Mark Score
3,568
3,678+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1536
1920+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS+200%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
96
120+25%
L1 Cache
576 KB
720 KB+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-8QP104-100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-8Q and 64-bit on the P104-100.

FeatureGRID M6-8QP104-100
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M6-8QP104-100
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
35.7
122.6+243%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-8Q came in at $1500, while the P104-100 launched at $0. On MSRP, P104-100 was 100+% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GRID M6-8Q) vs Infinity (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is P104-100 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M6-8QP104-100
MSRP
$1500
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.4
Infinity
Codename
GM204
GP104
Release
August 30 2015
December 12 2017
Ranking
#535
#529

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.