GRID M6-8Q vs GRID T4-2Q

CPU

GPU

GRID M6-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz

GRID T4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GRID M6-8Q

100

3,568

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GRID T4-2Q

225

3,668

+2.8%

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-8Q is positioned at rank 273 and the GRID T4-2Q is on rank 231, so the GRID T4-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-8Q

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

99%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

98%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

89%

#258

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

6207%

#273

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

100%

#276

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

98%

#278

Tesla M60

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250

98%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

95%

#280

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

93%

#281

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

93%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

90%

#285

GRID P4-2Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235

89%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

87%

#288

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-2Q

#96

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

100%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

97%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

96%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

94%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

87%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

84%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

74%

#216

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3404%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

100%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

84%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

84%

#241

FirePro S7000

MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40

83%

#242

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

83%

#243

FirePro V7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $100

81%

#244

Quadro P500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

76%

#246

FireStream 9370

MSRP: $800|Avg: $50

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID T4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-8Q.

Insight	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M6-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M6-8Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $600), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 483.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+483.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($100)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M6-8Q Benchmark Check

GRID T4-2Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-8Q and GRID T4-2Q

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q).

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,568	3,668+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+118%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	96	128+33%
L1 Cache	576 KB	768 KB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID M6-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GRID M6-8Q	GRID T4-2Q
TDP	100W-56%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	35.7+119%	16.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M6-8Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845 and now averages $600. The GRID M6-8Q costs 83.3% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 6.1 (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID M6-8Q offers 485.2% better value.