GRID M6-8Q
VS
GeForce GTX 680M SLI

GRID M6-8Q vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

GRID M6-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

2012Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-8Q is positioned at rank 273 and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI is on rank 141, so the GeForce GTX 680M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-8Q

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
99%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
98%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
89%
#258
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6207%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
100%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
98%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
98%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
95%
#280
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#281
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
93%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
90%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
89%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
87%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
97%
#131
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
304%
#133
276%
#134
275%
#138
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
250%
#139
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
248%
#141
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
98%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-8Q.

InsightGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0%)
Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-8Q and GeForce GTX 680M SLI

NVIDIA

GRID M6-8Q

The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI reaches 3,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI).

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,568
3,569
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2688+75%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
DirectX
12_1
12 (11_0)
Max Displays
0
4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 680M SLI's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
35.7
47.6+33%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M6-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGRID M6-8QGeForce GTX 680M SLI
MSRP
$1500
Avg Price (30d)
$100
Codename
GM204
N13E-GTX
Release
August 30 2015
June 4 2012
Ranking
#535
#385