
GRID M6-8Q vs GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

GRID M6-8Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-8Q is positioned at rank 273 and the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is on rank 102, so the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-8Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-8Q.
| Insight | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-8Q and GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

GRID M6-8Q
The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition reaches 3,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition).
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,568 | 3,569 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 2.448 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+350% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) — the GRID M6-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition's 122W — a 19.8% difference. The GRID M6-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 105mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-18% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 105mm |
| Height | — | 82mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.7+22% | 29.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M6-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #535 | #625 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















