G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
39.8% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro K2200

2014

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
39.8% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K2200 better than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,580 vs 3,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K2200 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro K2200 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. Quadro K2200 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro K2200 is about $199 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $699 MSRP, and you are getting 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $500 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $699 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro K2200 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low	34 FPS	37 FPS
medium	21 FPS	30 FPS
high	13 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	16 FPS	29 FPS
medium	9 FPS	21 FPS
high	4 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	11 FPS
medium	3 FPS	9 FPS
high	2 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	5 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low	83 FPS	70 FPS
medium	51 FPS	46 FPS
high	38 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	38 FPS	39 FPS
medium	27 FPS	22 FPS
high	18 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	13 FPS
medium	10 FPS	8 FPS
high	8 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	5 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low	161 FPS	158 FPS
medium	129 FPS	126 FPS
high	107 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	79 FPS
1440p
low	121 FPS	118 FPS
medium	97 FPS	94 FPS
high	81 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	79 FPS
medium	64 FPS	63 FPS
high	54 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
1080p
low	161 FPS	141 FPS
medium	129 FPS	111 FPS
high	107 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	121 FPS	82 FPS
medium	97 FPS	61 FPS
high	81 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	43 FPS
medium	57 FPS	31 FPS
high	46 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	15 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
G3D Mark Score	3,580+2%	3,500
Architecture	Maxwell	Terascale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640	2240+250%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire has 2 GB. The Quadro K2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200) vs None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Encoder	NVENC 4th Gen	None
Decoder	NVDEC 1	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 203mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
TDP	68W	50W-26%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	203mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-17%	90
Perf/Watt	52.6	70.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699. The Quadro K2200 costs 28.5% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs 5.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) — the Quadro K2200 offers 44% better value. The Quadro K2200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).